Rivals Will Evaluate Your Kid for $399, and Ranking Is Not Included

A blank sheet of paper on a black clipboard with a pencil on a wooden desk
Photo: Kelly Sikkema / Unsplash

Pay $399 and Rivals will evaluate your kid. Pay $399 and you may still not get ranked. Read that twice, because that is the actual product.

Rivals announced a paid program called Rivals Recruits on September 24, 2026, according to Front Office Sports, which reported the paid evaluation tool had been running since July. Claiming a basic profile costs $29.99 the first year and $59.99 after. A scout evaluation, covering height and weight verification, a film breakdown, an interview with the athlete’s high school coach and a grade on a 0-to-100 scale, costs $399. Rivals first announced it at $499 with a temporary 20 percent discount (BroBible showed the same), but Shannon Terry, the Rivals founder and owner, told Front Office Sports that $399 is the official price.

The Rivals Recruits price ladder

U.S. dollars, as listed in September 2026
Profile, first year$29.99
Profile, after year one$59.99
Scout evaluation, official$399
Evaluation, first announced$499
List prices as reported at announcement. The $499 figure was the original price with a temporary 20 percent discount, per BroBible and Front Office Sports.

What $399 Actually Buys

Rivals’ own pitch says the evaluation buys “ranking consideration,” not a ranking. You can pay $399 and still not make the list. Terry did not dress this up. Asked about the model, he said, “we’re a business,” and confirmed that employee pay is tied, directly and indirectly, to “reach and awareness.” By his own figures, Rivals has eight active scouts, about 300 public profiles, and star-rated roughly 6,600 athletes last year. He also said grades remain free for players who earn one organically.

That is an unusually plain admission from an operation whose value to families rests on the look of independent scouting. It is why a price on “consideration” is the whole controversy: a star rating is only worth something to a recruit if someone credible has to be persuaded to give it.

The People Who Actually Recruit Are Not Buying It

The reaction from people who have played and coached at this level was not subtle. Former NFL defensive end Chris Long wrote on X that it “feels predatory.” Robert Griffin III, the 2011 Heisman winner, called it “a MASSIVE MONEY GRAB taking advantage of parents and kids” and said Rivals “should be ashamed of themselves.” Georgia State quarterbacks coach Ryan Williams wrote, “Waste of money,” and added, “We don’t recruit based on Rivals rankings.”

That last line, from someone who actually recruits, answers what the rankings are worth to the people doing the recruiting, as opposed to the parents who do not know better.

The NIL Angle Is the Part That Should Worry You

The NIL angle should worry people more than the $399 itself. An Atlanta-area high school coach told Front Office Sports he thinks Rivals is “wanting to see how far parents are willing to go for an evaluation to secure NIL,” calling it a “High/low risk for a bigger reward in NIL.”

There is also an unverified claim in circulation. A social media post questioned why Rivals messaged a recruit who it said already had roughly 30 scholarship offers and a top-100 ranking at 247Sports. Front Office Sports did not verify it, and Terry denied targeting established prospects: “There’s no salespeople. We’re not reaching out.”

Honest About the Business, Silent About the Product

Whether or not that claim holds up, the structure speaks for itself. A ranking industry that spent decades selling the idea that its grades were earned has put an explicit price on consideration for the grade, at a moment when NIL money gives rankings more financial weight than ever. Terry’s answer, that Rivals is a business, is honest. What families are buying is the open question, and Rivals has already said it is not a ranking.

VDG Sports, where Vince Douglas Gregory writes about the business and culture of sports, will keep asking what recruiting media sells when it sells “consideration.”

← Older

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *